PDF Exclusivity Rebates as Abuse of Dominant Position

Exclusivity Rebates as Abuse of Dominant Position

Clarity from the ECJ on exclusivity rebates as an abuse

Intel judgment: Clarity from the ECJ on exclusivity rebates as an abuse. 07 September 2017 Articles. The European Court of Justice (ECJ) yesterday delivered its judgment in relation to Intel's appeal from the General Court, and has set aside the General Court's judgment on the basis that it failed to consider certain arguments advanced by Intel ...

REBATES: COMPETITION ON THE MERITS OR EXCLUSIONARY

What is an Abuse of a Dominant Position? European University Institute June 2003 REBATES: COMPETITION ON THE MERITS OR EXCLUSIONARY PRACTICE ? by Luc Gyselen ' Luc Gyselen, 2003 The author is Head of Unit at the Directorate General for petition of the European mission. All views expressed in this written contribution are strictly personal ...

ALERT MEMORANDUM Modernising Abuse of Dominance –the CJEU

missionwas correct to conclude that the rebates at issue were capable of restricting competition. The CJEU Judgmentqualifiesthe position taken by the General Court, whichhadtreated exclusivity rebates as akin to a per se abuse.The CJEU makes clear that companies candispute the anticompetitive

Intel Judgment: Clarity From The ECJ On Exclusivity

Exclusivity rebates: being rebates which are conditional on customers obtaining all or most of their requirements from the dominant firm. The General Court noted that such rebates would infringe EU competition law, unless it could be shown that there was an objective justification for their use.

Case T 286 09 Intel v mission: Exclusivity rebates and

Case T 286 09 Intel v mission: Exclusivity rebates and abuse of a dominant position. Leave a reply. ... Intel gave exclusivity rebates to 4 big computer manufacturers (Dell, Lenovo, HP and NEC) – rebates on condition they bought all or nearly all their processors from Intel ... Abuse of dominance Admissibility Annulment action Appeal ...